4. Hiralal-Advocate (appellant) Vs Bada Meena (respondent )- DC Appeal No. 35/2001

In the case of Hiralal-Advocate vs Bada Meena (DC Appeal No. 35/2001), the appellant, Hiralal-Advocate, filed an appeal against the respondent, Bada Meena, in the District Court. The case was related to a land dispute between the two parties.

The appellant claimed that the land in question belonged to him and he had the necessary documents to prove his ownership. The respondent, on the other hand, argued that he had purchased the land from the previous owner and had been in possession of it for many years.

After hearing both sides, the District Court ruled in favor of the respondent, stating that he had produced enough evidence to prove his ownership of the land. The appellant then filed an appeal in the higher court, challenging the decision of the District Court.

The higher court examined the evidence presented by both parties and found that the respondent had indeed produced enough evidence to prove his ownership of the land. The court, therefore, upheld the decision of the District Court and dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant.

In conclusion, the case of Hiralal-Advocate vs Bada Meena (DC Appeal No. 35/2001) was a land dispute case where the higher court upheld the decision of the District Court and ruled in favor of the respondent.